Form and Trends for Tuesday, 4 August, 2020
Most wins
| № | Team | WinsW | MatchesMP | PercentPr |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | FC Ilves 2 | 7 | 7 | 100% |
| 1 | Sheriff Tiraspol |
7 | 7 | 100% |
| 1 | Tromso | 7 | 7 | 100% |
| 4 | AC Oulu |
6 | 6 | 100% |
| 4 | Shamrock Rovers | 6 | 6 | 100% |
| 6 | Bangkok United | 4 | 4 | 100% |
| 6 | Cabinteely | 4 | 4 | 100% |
| 6 | Fredrikstad | 4 | 4 | 100% |
| 6 | Kvik Halden | 4 | 4 | 100% |
| 6 | Ratchaburi FC | 4 | 4 | 100% |
| 11 | Al Ahly Cairo | 16 | 17 | 94% |
| 12 | Bodo Glimt | 11 | 12 | 92% |
| 12 | Riga FC | 11 | 12 | 92% |
| 14 | Istiklol Dushanbe | 8 | 9 | 89% |
| 15 | Esperance de Tunis | 15 | 17 | 88% |
| 16 | Kawasaki Frontale | 7 | 8 | 88% |
| 17 | Flora Tallinn | 13 | 15 | 87% |
| 17 | HB Torshavn |
13 | 15 | 87% |
| 19 | Klubi-04 Helsinki | 6 | 7 | 86% |
| 19 | Petrocub-Hincesti |
6 | 7 | 86% |
| 19 | Universidad Catolica | 6 | 7 | 86% |
| 22 | TP Mazembe | 17 | 20 | 85% |
| 23 | Alianza Universidad | 5 | 6 | 83% |
| 24 | Al-Hidd | 9 | 11 | 82% |
| 25 | Ulsan HD | 11 | 14 | 79% |
| 26 | IF Sylvia | 7 | 9 | 78% |
| 26 | IFK Varnamo | 7 | 9 | 78% |
| 26 | Pakhtakor Tashkent |
7 | 9 | 78% |
| 26 | Universitatea Craiova | 7 | 9 | 78% |
| 26 | V-Varen Nagasaki | 7 | 9 | 78% |
| 26 | Vasalunds IF | 7 | 9 | 78% |
| 32 | Suduva Marijampole | 10 | 13 | 77% |
| 33 | Molde |
9 | 12 | 75% |
| 33 | RFS Riga | 9 | 12 | 75% |
| 35 | Leiknir Reykjavik | 6 | 8 | 75% |
| 35 | Omiya Ardija | 6 | 8 | 75% |
| 37 | Alta | 3 | 4 | 75% |
| 37 | Arendal | 3 | 4 | 75% |
| 37 | BG Pathum United | 3 | 4 | 75% |
| 37 | Bryne | 3 | 4 | 75% |
| 37 | Eidsvold TF | 3 | 4 | 75% |
| 37 | Johor Darul Takzim | 3 | 4 | 75% |
| 37 | Kairat Almaty | 3 | 4 | 75% |
| 37 | LDU de Quito | 3 | 4 | 75% |
| 37 | Police Tero | 3 | 4 | 75% |
| 37 | Port Bangkok | 3 | 4 | 75% |
| 37 | Sotra SK | 3 | 4 | 75% |
| 37 | Tampines Rovers | 3 | 4 | 75% |
| 37 | Vard Haugesund | 3 | 4 | 75% |
| 50 | Persepolis Tehran | 20 | 27 | 74% |
Only Home Matches
| № | Team | WinsW | MatchesMP | PercentPr |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | TP Mazembe | 8 | 8 | 100% |
| 2 | Bodo Glimt | 6 | 6 | 100% |
| 2 | Palmaflor del Tropico | 6 | 6 | 100% |
| 2 | Riga FC | 6 | 6 | 100% |
| 2 | Vasalunds IF | 6 | 6 | 100% |
| 6 | Molde |
5 | 5 | 100% |
| 7 | AC Oulu | 4 | 4 | 100% |
| 7 | Bunyodkor Tashkent | 4 | 4 | 100% |
| 7 | Curico Unido | 4 | 4 | 100% |
| 7 | FC Ilves 2 | 4 | 4 | 100% |
| 7 | IF Sylvia | 4 | 4 | 100% |
| 7 | Inter Turku | 4 | 4 | 100% |
| 7 | Kyoto Sanga FC | 4 | 4 | 100% |
| 7 | Navbahor Namangan | 4 | 4 | 100% |
| 7 | Petrocub-Hincesti | 4 | 4 | 100% |
| 7 | Sheriff Tiraspol |
4 | 4 | 100% |
| 7 | Tromso | 4 | 4 | 100% |
| 18 | Young Boys | 16 | 18 | 89% |
| 19 | Al Ahly Cairo | 8 | 9 | 89% |
| 19 | Esperance de Tunis | 8 | 9 | 89% |
| 21 | Flora Tallinn | 7 | 8 | 88% |
| 22 | Altyn Asyr Ashgabat | 6 | 7 | 86% |
| 22 | Always Ready La Paz | 6 | 7 | 86% |
| 22 | HB Torshavn | 6 | 7 | 86% |
| 22 | Jeonbuk Hyundai Motors | 6 | 7 | 86% |
| 22 | NSI Runavik | 6 | 7 | 86% |
| 22 | Pakhtakor Tashkent | 6 | 7 | 86% |
| 28 | Juventus | 16 | 19 | 84% |
| 29 | AGMK Olmaliq | 5 | 6 | 83% |
| 29 | Kokand 1912 |
5 | 6 | 83% |
| 29 | Nacional Potosi | 5 | 6 | 83% |
| 29 | The Strongest La Paz | 5 | 6 | 83% |
| 33 | Al-Hilal Riyadh | 9 | 11 | 82% |
| 33 | Maniema Union | 9 | 11 | 82% |
| 35 | Al-Hidd | 4 | 5 | 80% |
| 35 | Al-Muharraq | 4 | 5 | 80% |
| 35 | Al-Riffa | 4 | 5 | 80% |
| 35 | CFR Cluj | 4 | 5 | 80% |
| 35 | Degerfors | 4 | 5 | 80% |
| 35 | Hoang Anh Gia Lai | 4 | 5 | 80% |
| 35 | IFK Varnamo | 4 | 5 | 80% |
| 35 | Istiklol Dushanbe | 4 | 5 | 80% |
| 35 | Lunds | 4 | 5 | 80% |
| 35 | RFS Riga | 4 | 5 | 80% |
| 35 | Universitatea Craiova | 4 | 5 | 80% |
| 35 | V-Varen Nagasaki | 4 | 5 | 80% |
| 47 | FC Minaj | 11 | 14 | 79% |
| 47 | Volyn Lutsk | 11 | 14 | 79% |
| 49 | Cavalry FC | 7 | 9 | 78% |
| 49 | Forge FC | 7 | 9 | 78% |