Form and Trends for Thursday, 6 August, 2020
Most wins
| № | Team | WinsW | MatchesMP | PercentPr |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sheriff Tiraspol | 8 | 8 | 100% |
| 2 | FC Ilves 2 | 7 | 7 | 100% |
| 2 | Tromso | 7 | 7 | 100% |
| 4 | Shamrock Rovers | 6 | 6 | 100% |
| 5 | Bangkok United | 4 | 4 | 100% |
| 5 | Cabinteely |
4 | 4 | 100% |
| 5 | Fredrikstad |
4 | 4 | 100% |
| 5 | Kvik Halden |
4 | 4 | 100% |
| 5 | Ratchaburi FC | 4 | 4 | 100% |
| 10 | Al Ahly Cairo | 16 | 17 | 94% |
| 11 | Bodo Glimt |
11 | 12 | 92% |
| 11 | Riga FC |
11 | 12 | 92% |
| 13 | Istiklol Dushanbe |
8 | 9 | 89% |
| 14 | Esperance de Tunis |
15 | 17 | 88% |
| 15 | Kawasaki Frontale |
7 | 8 | 88% |
| 16 | Flora Tallinn |
13 | 15 | 87% |
| 16 | HB Torshavn |
13 | 15 | 87% |
| 18 | AC Oulu |
6 | 7 | 86% |
| 18 | Klubi-04 Helsinki | 6 | 7 | 86% |
| 18 | Universidad Catolica | 6 | 7 | 86% |
| 21 | TP Mazembe | 17 | 20 | 85% |
| 22 | Alianza Universidad | 5 | 6 | 83% |
| 23 | Al-Hidd |
9 | 11 | 82% |
| 24 | Ulsan HD |
11 | 14 | 79% |
| 25 | IF Sylvia |
7 | 9 | 78% |
| 25 | IFK Varnamo |
7 | 9 | 78% |
| 25 | Pakhtakor Tashkent |
7 | 9 | 78% |
| 25 | Universitatea Craiova | 7 | 9 | 78% |
| 25 | V-Varen Nagasaki |
7 | 9 | 78% |
| 25 | Vasalunds IF | 7 | 9 | 78% |
| 31 | Molde | 10 | 13 | 77% |
| 31 | Suduva Marijampole |
10 | 13 | 77% |
| 33 | RFS Riga |
9 | 12 | 75% |
| 34 | Leiknir Reykjavik |
6 | 8 | 75% |
| 34 | Omiya Ardija |
6 | 8 | 75% |
| 34 | Petrocub-Hincesti | 6 | 8 | 75% |
| 37 | Alta |
3 | 4 | 75% |
| 37 | Arendal |
3 | 4 | 75% |
| 37 | BG Pathum United | 3 | 4 | 75% |
| 37 | Bryne |
3 | 4 | 75% |
| 37 | Eidsvold TF |
3 | 4 | 75% |
| 37 | Johor Darul Takzim | 3 | 4 | 75% |
| 37 | Kairat Almaty | 3 | 4 | 75% |
| 37 | LDU de Quito | 3 | 4 | 75% |
| 37 | Police Tero | 3 | 4 | 75% |
| 37 | Port Bangkok | 3 | 4 | 75% |
| 37 | Sotra SK | 3 | 4 | 75% |
| 37 | Tampines Rovers | 3 | 4 | 75% |
| 37 | Vard Haugesund |
3 | 4 | 75% |
| 50 | Persepolis Tehran |
20 | 27 | 74% |
Only Home Matches
| № | Team | WinsW | MatchesMP | PercentPr |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | TP Mazembe | 8 | 8 | 100% |
| 2 | Bodo Glimt | 6 | 6 | 100% |
| 2 | Molde | 6 | 6 | 100% |
| 2 | Palmaflor del Tropico | 6 | 6 | 100% |
| 2 | Riga FC |
6 | 6 | 100% |
| 2 | Vasalunds IF | 6 | 6 | 100% |
| 7 | Sheriff Tiraspol | 5 | 5 | 100% |
| 8 | AC Oulu |
4 | 4 | 100% |
| 8 | Bunyodkor Tashkent | 4 | 4 | 100% |
| 8 | Curico Unido | 4 | 4 | 100% |
| 8 | FC Ilves 2 | 4 | 4 | 100% |
| 8 | IF Sylvia |
4 | 4 | 100% |
| 8 | Inter Turku | 4 | 4 | 100% |
| 8 | Kyoto Sanga FC | 4 | 4 | 100% |
| 8 | Navbahor Namangan | 4 | 4 | 100% |
| 8 | Petrocub-Hincesti | 4 | 4 | 100% |
| 8 | Tromso | 4 | 4 | 100% |
| 18 | Young Boys | 16 | 18 | 89% |
| 19 | Al Ahly Cairo | 8 | 9 | 89% |
| 19 | Esperance de Tunis | 8 | 9 | 89% |
| 21 | Flora Tallinn |
7 | 8 | 88% |
| 22 | Altyn Asyr Ashgabat | 6 | 7 | 86% |
| 22 | Always Ready La Paz | 6 | 7 | 86% |
| 22 | HB Torshavn | 6 | 7 | 86% |
| 22 | Jeonbuk Hyundai Motors | 6 | 7 | 86% |
| 22 | NSI Runavik | 6 | 7 | 86% |
| 22 | Pakhtakor Tashkent | 6 | 7 | 86% |
| 28 | Juventus | 16 | 19 | 84% |
| 29 | AGMK Olmaliq | 5 | 6 | 83% |
| 29 | Kokand 1912 | 5 | 6 | 83% |
| 29 | Nacional Potosi | 5 | 6 | 83% |
| 29 | The Strongest La Paz | 5 | 6 | 83% |
| 33 | Al-Hilal Riyadh | 9 | 11 | 82% |
| 33 | Maniema Union | 9 | 11 | 82% |
| 35 | Al-Hidd | 4 | 5 | 80% |
| 35 | Al-Muharraq |
4 | 5 | 80% |
| 35 | Al-Riffa |
4 | 5 | 80% |
| 35 | CFR Cluj | 4 | 5 | 80% |
| 35 | Degerfors |
4 | 5 | 80% |
| 35 | Hoang Anh Gia Lai | 4 | 5 | 80% |
| 35 | IFK Varnamo |
4 | 5 | 80% |
| 35 | Istiklol Dushanbe | 4 | 5 | 80% |
| 35 | Lunds | 4 | 5 | 80% |
| 35 | RFS Riga |
4 | 5 | 80% |
| 35 | Universitatea Craiova | 4 | 5 | 80% |
| 35 | V-Varen Nagasaki | 4 | 5 | 80% |
| 47 | FC Minaj | 11 | 14 | 79% |
| 47 | Volyn Lutsk |
11 | 14 | 79% |
| 49 | Cavalry FC | 7 | 9 | 78% |
| 49 | Forge FC | 7 | 9 | 78% |